Thanks for amplifying this disturbing pronouncement and for your sensitivity in unpacking the issues. Guilt by association and vague standards have no place in the legal profession. Shame on S&C
With all due respect, I think you’re being very naïve. Any employer has the right to vet the background of somebody before hiring them. And if an employer doesn’t want to hire somebody because they have a demonstrated history of antisemitism, they have that right also. I don’t see how anyone can reasonably dispute either of those two points. Everything else is really a projection on your part that may or may not actually occur (and most likely will not occur).
Thanks for amplifying this disturbing pronouncement and for your sensitivity in unpacking the issues. Guilt by association and vague standards have no place in the legal profession. Shame on S&C
With all due respect, I think you’re being very naïve. Any employer has the right to vet the background of somebody before hiring them. And if an employer doesn’t want to hire somebody because they have a demonstrated history of antisemitism, they have that right also. I don’t see how anyone can reasonably dispute either of those two points. Everything else is really a projection on your part that may or may not actually occur (and most likely will not occur).
Why don’t you acknowledge that the protests are pro Hamas. And overtly antisemitic. Sorry but I’m not buying the crap you are selling.
Why not just say you don't want Arab or Muslim attorneys?